Personal
Become a Client
Investment Tips
11/11/2021
Franklin Templeton Thoughts: Is the Energy Price Surge “Transitory” or a Longer-Lasting Trend?

Energy prices have surged to multi-year highs amid the global economic recovery from COVID-19, contributing to larger-than-anticipated jumps in measures of headline inflation. While some policymakers had suggested inflationary forces would prove “transitory,” today many are questioning that thesis. Franklin Equity Group Portfolio Manager Frederick Fromm outlines what has been impacting energy prices, whether he sees the recent price rise as sustainable, and where he is finding investment opportunities within the sector.

Rapidly rising energy costs have been making headlines this month after building steadily throughout the summer. Crude oil and natural gas prices have reached multi-year highs, with US benchmark West Texas Intermediate crude trading above US$80 a barrel for the first time since 2014 (up from the 2020 pandemic low of US$19.33 a barrel), while natural gas futures rose to their highest level since 2013.

In Europe, even faster-rising natural gas and power prices have raised the spectre of an energy crisis heading into winter. Natural gas prices in some parts of the continent reached more than US$30 per million British thermal units (BTUs) as several European countries began to compete more aggressively to secure supplies, including bidding against China for liquified natural gas (LNG) cargoes. In addition to impacting industries that use natural gas as a feedstock—including fertiliser, chemicals and plastics manufacturing—the rally has elicited a rise in switching from natural gas to petroleum and even coal for power generation, which could meaningfully increase demand for oil and provide further support for oil prices.

While Europe has been grappling with a supply crunch, Brazil and other South American countries were contending with a different cause with a similar effect, having recently grown more dependent on natural gas-fired electricity generation as a drought crimped hydroelectric output. The region’s LNG demand has almost doubled in the past year. Booming demand has been met with lower supply of LNG while small disruptions—some caused by maintenance, others unplanned—have nibbled away at global output. The combined effect has been to cut global LNG supply by roughly 5% in 2021.

A global natural-gas production deficit, dwindling inventories and a concerted regulatory effort by the Chinese government to slash emissions—substituting lower-carbon fuels such as LNG for coal—all play a role in the current energy supply/demand imbalance. With US stockpiles already running below their five-year seasonal average, growing US natural gas exports could trigger additional price spikes as power plants and factories are forced to compete with rising home and business heating demand as the Northern Hemisphere winter heating season gets underway.

Although US energy producers have historically responded to such market signals with more drilling and production, putting pricing hedges in place before the rally—mostly to lock in prices and cash flow to help reduce debt—have served to limit additional spending and a stronger ramp-up in drilling.

The number of US natural gas-focused rigs has only partially recovered from pandemic lows and plateaued around 100 this summer, which was half of pre-pandemic levels (despite the profit motive of much higher prices). The public natural gas-levered producers are focusing on shareholder returns instead of growth, partially due to shareholder pressure, thereby muting the supply response. Additionally, several large natural gas-focused exploration and production firms locked in prices with hedges below US$3 per million BTUs and thus were unable to fully benefit from the recent price spike above $5/mmbtu. These factors helped keep overall US natural gas production relatively stagnant at 92 to 93 billion cubic feet per day for the first eight months of the year.

Oil inventories have declined significantly since the depths of the pandemic and are now below pre-pandemic levels, which has helped support prices. On the supply side, energy companies have continued to embrace spending discipline and shareholder returns while some large integrated oil and gas companies are pivoting away from traditional oil and gas investment in a move toward broader energy strategies that include renewables and other low-carbon fuels. Combined with free cash flow yields above 10% for some companies, compared to a 2% average for companies in the S&P 500 Index, we believe this presents an attractive investment opportunity.

Supply and Demand Pointing to Sustained Higher Prices

Concerns of slower-than-expected economic growth in the United States and China related to a summer rise in COVID-19 cases, along with China’s efforts to tame commodity prices and reduce emissions, had kept prices constrained. OPEC+ had been taking a measured approach in bringing previously curtailed production back to the market in conjunction with the pandemic recovery in demand, but the consortium thus far has not committed to lift output in a way that might fully compensate for a more rapid recovery in demand.

Once OPEC+ spare capacity is absorbed, which we believe will occur incrementally over the next year, and perhaps much sooner given fuel switching this winter, oil prices will need to remain at levels high enough to incentivise additional investment, which should continue to support producer equity values.

We also believe any further economic weakness tied to the virus’s spread will likely prove to be temporary, and thus from an investor’s standpoint, only represents a short-term headwind for natural resource companies. Vaccination programmes continue apace, while cases have been declining in several countries and appear to be plateauing in others. Meanwhile, and despite goals of limiting property market excesses and moderating commodity inflation while reducing pollution, we think China is unlikely to allow a significant deceleration in its economic growth and may take fine-tuning steps to soften the impact of its policy moves over the past year.

While the above factors may slow demand growth for commodities in the near term, we believe several trends will continue to support prices, such as stimulus-driven consumption and an eventual reduction in global supply chain impediments that should boost manufacturing.

Heading into October, total US oil demand was running nearly 14% higher than a year ago, while commercial crude inventories of 418.5 million barrels were down 15% to the lowest level since October 2018. US combined production of crude oil and petroleum products were also well below levels at this point of 2019 and 2020.

Meanwhile, long-term demand trends remain firmly in place, with infrastructure and energy transition spending likely to drive consumption of base metals while developing-market demand for both traditional and green energy continues to grow. Alternative renewable sources of energy—solar and wind projects in particular—are not coming on-stream fast enough to replace the deficit between energy demand and supply and have not been reliable in the recent past as some regions experienced unusually calm wind conditions.

As energy prices race higher, risks to the economic recovery are rising and growth could be slower than forecast. Economists say the energy surge is still far from the kind of “oil shock” that could trigger a recession, but the trend is troubling and much higher prices across the economy could spook consumers and slow spending.

A perfect storm of energy shortages and high demand has made the outlook uncertain for energy prices globally. Some analysts say a cold winter could make the problems even worse.

From an investment standpoint, demand and production trends, when combined with ongoing supply limitations, keep us constructive on natural resource equities, including energy. However, selectivity has been critical as commodities can display differing levels of sensitivity to various economic trends. For instance, iron ore prices have declined significantly as the Chinese government took steps to cool inflation and emissions and recent volatility in their property markets may further curtail demand. While this can affect many commodities, construction materials such as steel and its raw materials (iron ore and metallurgical coal) may be disproportionately impacted given the large influence of the Chinese property market. And although copper markets may also be negatively impacted if construction demand slows, inventories are at very low levels and long-term demand trends appear robust as energy transition spending heats up. Meanwhile, oil and natural gas markets, while not immune to such headwinds, should fare better as China represents a smaller portion of global demand and given other influences such as supply limitations and secular demand trends.




Franklin Templeton Key risks & Disclaimers:

Important Legal Information

This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. It does not constitute legal or tax advice.

The views expressed are those of the investment manager and the comments, opinions and analyses are rendered as of publication date and may change without notice. The information provided in this material is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region or market.

Data from third party sources may have been used in the preparation of this material and Franklin Templeton (“FT”) has not independently verified, validated or audited such data. FT accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss arising from use of this information and reliance upon the comments, opinions and analyses in the material is at the sole discretion of the user.

Products, services and information may not be available in all jurisdictions and are offered outside the U.S. by other FT affiliates and/or their distributors as local laws and regulation permits. Please consult your own professional adviser or Franklin Templeton institutional contact for further information on availability of products and services in your jurisdiction.

Issued in the U.S. by Franklin Templeton Distributors, Inc., One Franklin Parkway, San Mateo, California 94403-1906, (800) DIAL BEN/342-5236, franklintempleton.com—Franklin Templeton Distributors, Inc. is the principal distributor of Franklin Templeton’s U.S. registered products, which are not FDIC insured; may lose value; and are not bank guaranteed and are available only in jurisdictions where an offer or solicitation of such products is permitted under applicable laws and regulation.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.

What are the risks?

All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. The value of investments can go down as well as up, and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future results. Actively managed strategies could experience losses if the investment manager’s judgment about markets, interest rates or the attractiveness, relative values, liquidity or potential appreciation of particular investments made for a portfolio, proves to be incorrect. There can be no guarantee that an investment manager’s investment techniques or decisions will produce the desired results. Diversification does not guarantee profit or protect against risk of loss.



MeDirect Disclaimers:

This information has been accurately reproduced, as received from Franklin Templeton Investment Management Limited (FTIML). No information has been omitted which would render the reproduced information inaccurate or misleading. This information is being distributed by MeDirect Bank (Malta) plc to its customers. The information contained in this document is for general information purposes only and is not intended to provide legal or other professional advice nor does it commit MeDirect Bank (Malta) plc to any obligation whatsoever. The information available in this document is not intended to be a suggestion, recommendation or solicitation to buy, hold or sell, any securities and is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness.

The financial instruments discussed in the document may not be suitable for all investors and investors must make their own informed decisions and seek their own advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in financial instruments or implementing strategies discussed herein.

If you invest in this product you may lose some or all of the money you invest. The value of your investment may go down as well as up. A commission or sales fee may be charged at the time of the initial purchase for an investment. Any income you get from this investment may go down as well as up. This product may be affected by changes in currency exchange rate movements thereby affecting your investment return therefrom. The performance figures quoted refer to the past and past performance is not a guarantee of future performance or a reliable guide to future performance. Any decision to invest in a mutual fund should always be based upon the details contained in the Prospectus and Key Investor Information Document (KIID), which may be obtained from MeDirect Bank (Malta) plc.

Why choose MeDirect?
We are a specialised bank, focused on providing market leading savings products, investment services and wealth management. With low and transparent fees, make the most of your wealth and open an account today.

© 2021 MeDirect Bank (Malta) plc. All rights reserved.
MeDirect Bank (Malta) plc, company registration number C34125, is licensed to undertake the business of banking in terms of the Banking Act (Cap. 371) and investment services under the Investment Services Act (Cap. 370). MeDirect Bank (Malta) plc is regulated by the Malta Financial Services Authority as a Credit Institution under the Banking Act 1994.